The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
September 13, 2016
Back to Press Releases
There is mass production of unnecessary, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses, according to a new study in the September issue of The Milbank Quarterly. In an examination of PubMed-indexed articles, author John Ioannidis of Stanford University found that many systematic reviews and meta-analyses are overproduced. As of result, too many reviews are redundancy, have little value, make misleading claims, or are produced by those with clear conflicts of interest.
