The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 7, 2017
Back to Press Releases
In mid-April, the direct-to-consumer genetic testing firm 23andMe received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorization to sell tests for 10 genetic health risk reports directly to consumers. As the New York Times reported on May 12, the tests pose potential programs for long-term care insurers who may not have access to results. While policymakers have been debating the appropriateness of these tests for more than a decade, little is known about past consumers’ views regarding the regulation of these products or whether personal experience with testing is related to these views. A new study in the June issue of The Milbank Quarterly by Sarah E. Gollust of the University of Minnesota School of Public Health and colleagues has found that a majority of consumers support expanded access to direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (DTC-PGT) services and oppose additional government regulation, while those who have had a negative experience with the tests were less supportive of expanded availability without a medical professional.