The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
September 26, 2017
News Article
Oct 30, 2024
Sep 27, 2024
Sep 24, 2024
Back to Articles and Updates
The federal government is committed to supporting state health policy innovation, but where is the common ground in an otherwise fractured political environment? Earlier this summer, the National Governors Association (NGA) released a summary of bipartisan ideas from 13 states about how to continue to improve the US health care system and strengthen the state-federal partnership in health care.
The Reforming States Group (RSG), a bipartisan group of senior legislative and executive branch state health policy leaders sponsored by the Milbank Memorial Fund, agrees wholeheartedly that states need to lead these efforts in exactly the bipartisan, evidence-based way put forth by the NGA.
In order to make governors aware of the RSG’s ideas for reaching these goals—goals which align well with theirs—the RSG sent governors its Letter to the New Administration (LNA), a bipartisan agenda sent to the new administration late last year that focuses on ways the federal government could assist states in accelerating and promoting population health. In its note to governors, RSG leadership from Colorado, New York, San Diego, Utah, and Connecticut, pointed to concerns shared by both the RSG and NGA and asked governors to consider incorporating relevant elements of the LNA’s bipartisan, evidence-based proposals into their own responses, including discussions with Congress, development of Medicaid waivers, state plan amendments, and federal contracts.
The LNA focuses on the following ideas:
“Health care reform, like other major domestic policy issues, requires a partnership between the states and the federal government and the Medicaid program, a topic of much discussion in the ‘repeal and replace’ debate,” said Rachel Block, program officer at the Milbank Memorial Fund. “Medicaid has operated as a state-federal partnership from its inception, while the state-federal partnership for health reform has evolved with opportunities to expand coverage and implement new delivery and payment models. But the RSG’s vision of state-federal partnerships for healthy populations is broader than Medicaid’s, extending to data standards and sharing, relationships with Medicare, and technical assistance to address the substance abuse crisis and other chronic conditions. The RSG provides a unique forum to promote evidence-based practice for population health that transcends branches of government and partisan divides. We hope the ideas presented in our letter are of use to the governors as they pursue their own policy initiatives with the federal government.”
Read the Letter to the New Administration and the NGA’s report Shared Priorities from the Governors’ Bipartisan Health Reform Learning Network.