The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 2022 (Volume 100)
Quarterly Article
Seth A. Berkowitz
Aug 13, 2024
Jul 23, 2024
June 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Three key “branch points” for designing policy approaches to address income-related health inequity are (1) should the needed good or service be obtained on the market? (2) do policy beneficiaries currently earn income? and (3) have policy beneficiaries earned income previously? The responses to these questions suggest one of four policy approaches: social services, social enfranchisement, social insurance, or social assistance.
Social conditions give rise to material realities. The social conditions structuring access to those resources “necessary to lower the risk of developing a disease, or minimize the consequences of a disease once it occurs” can be thought of as the fundamental causes of health. In this characterization, income is an archetypical example of a fundamental cause.
Though it is by no means the only factor, achieving and maintain- ing health requires sufficient consumption of particular goods and services across the life course. These goods and services include nutritious food, safe housing, education, and health care. In the United States’ political economy, these goods and services are typically obtained on the market, which has made income a principal driver of health as well as a fundamental cause of many diseases through many mechanisms. Furthermore, racism is a fundamental cause of disease in its own right. A common manifestation of structural racism in the United States is lower income among those persons identifying as Black, Hispanic, or Indigenous. This makes income one, though certainly not the only, explanation for the unjust health outcomes often experienced by individuals from minoritized racial and ethnic groups.
READ THE FULL TEXT ON THE WILEY ONLINE LIBRARY