The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 19, 2024
News Article
Mary Louise Gilburg
Oct 30, 2024
Sep 27, 2024
Sep 24, 2024
Back to Articles and Updates
This year, our 5 most-read publications (not including Milbank Quarterly articles) included the Primary Care Scorecard; a brief with recommendations for improving health care market oversight at the state level to help sure more sustainable health care costs and higher quality; a blog on the impact of a Supreme Court decision that opened the door to more legal challenges to federal regulations; and more. We hope you’ll check or revisit out these pieces.
The second national Primary Care Scorecard revealed an intensifying primary care crisis and identified five reasons why access to affordable, quality primary care services is expected to get worse. Developed by Yalda Jabbarpour and colleagues at the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Robert Graham Center and co-funded by the Milbank Memorial Fund and The Physicians Foundation, the report and data dashboard examine critical measures of primary care performance nationally and across states.
To address consolidation of health systems and physician practices, the entry of private equity, and other market changes, some states have strengthened and expanded the authority of their attorneys general, along with their health departments or independent state entities, to review and approve or reject proposed mergers. This report from Erin C. Fuse Brown of Georgia State University and Katherine L. Gudiksen of the Source on Healthcare Price and Competition offered recommendations and policy considerations for state policymakers to strengthen oversight authority of health care transactions.
In June, the Supreme Court overturned longstanding precedent by striking down the “Chevron doctrine,” a 40-year-old standard that required courts to defer to federal regulatory agencies to interpret ambiguous laws. This blog from Marci Nielsen explained how it will change the way key health agencies do business — and its impact on state health policy.
Given the rise in the rates of behavioral health conditions, many state officials are looking for ways to track spending on behavioral health treatment in order to measure workforce needs, improve care, set investment targets, and more. In this report, authors from Freedman HealthCare offered recommendations for a standardized state methodology to measure how much payers spend on behavioral health clinical services in a way that allows for comparability across states.
This series of Peterson-Milbank analytics support resources offered insight into how to use publicly available data sources to examine the financial condition of hospitals, as well as identify opportunities to reduce health care spending growth.