Mapping Mental Health Across US States: the Role of Economic and Social Support Policies

Tags:
Early View Perspective
Topics:
Mental health State Health Policy

Policy Points:

  • This perspective argues that state economic and social support policies are key determinants of population mental health.
  • Key policy successes of the past decade include state expansion of Medicaid eligibility, increase in minimum wage, and implementation of paid sick leave.
  • Key policy priorities include the prioritization of evidence-based policies that improve economic security and the expansion of social support policies that are not tied to employment.

Mental health (e.g., anxiety, depression) continues to be a major public health concern in the United States that impacts millions of individuals, their families, and communities. Approximately 21% of adults 18 years and older, or 55 million adults, reported symptoms of recent depression in 2022, demonstrating the wide reach of mental health challenges.1 Moreover, rates of depression and anxiety spiked at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and have not fully recovered to prepandemic levels, indicating that mental health will continue to be a major concern for population health.1-3 In addition to the impacts on individuals and their families, mental health challenges have vast economic and social costs. For instance, estimates suggest that depression accounted for $83 billion in costs in 2000,4 and suicide and nonfatal self-harm injuries, which are linked to mental health, cost the United States over $500 billion annually from 2015 to 2020.5

However, significant variation in mental health exists across states, pointing to states as an important contextual environment to consider. In this perspective, we propose a theoretical perspective that examines how state-level variation in mental health is shaped by clusters of state policies, especially economic and social support policies. To this end, we first describe patterns of population mental health at the national and state level. We then argue that differences in state policy contexts contribute to different rates of mental health outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety) across states. We conclude by recommending key areas for future research on state policy contexts and mental health that can yield greater insight into potential policy solutions to improve mental health.

open access

References

1

Terlizzi EPZablotsky BSymptoms of anxiety and depression among adults: United States, 2019 and 2022Natl Health Stat Report2024213:CS353885.

2

Czeisler MÉHoward MERajaratnam SMWMental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges, populations at risk, implications, and opportunitiesAm J Health Promot202135(2): 301311.

3

Ettman CK.Abdalla SMCohen GHSampson LVivier PMGalea SPrevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemicJAMA Netw Open20203(9):e2019686.

4

Gelenberg AJThe prevalence and impact of depressionJ Clin Psychiatry201071(3):e06.

5

Peterson CHaileyesus TStone DMEconomic cost of U.S. suicide and nonfatal self-harmAm J Prev Med202467(1): 129133.


Citation:
Donnelly R, Farina MP. Mapping Mental Health Across US States: the Role of Economic and Social Support Policies. Milbank Q. 2025;103(S1):0416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70015.