The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 1993 (Volume 71)
Quarterly Article
Arnold M. Epstein
David Blumenthal
Aug 13, 2024
Jul 25, 2024
Jul 23, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Medicare’s decision to compensate physicians using a fee schedule based on the relative value of their services was an attempt to rationalize fee-for-service payment of physicians. Reformers hoped also to control the costs of care, improve its quality, and protect access to health services among Medicare beneficiaries. A close examination of the system’s provisions indicates, however, that the reform does not address many fundamental problems that have plagued physician payment under Medicare in the past. In the cost area, for example, the new fee schedule does not affect such factors as the basic incentives built into fee-for-service medicine and the explosion of new medical technologies. The failure of the program to achieve its goals in cost containment and other areas could result in abandonment of fee-for-service compensation of physicians under Medicare.
Author(s): Arnold M. Epstein; David Blumenthal
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 71, Issue 2 (pages 193–215) Published in 1993