The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 17, 2015
News Article
Oct 30, 2024
Sep 27, 2024
Sep 24, 2024
Back to Articles and Updates
Does bringing together state leaders make a difference? This fall, members of the Reforming States Group (RSG) were surveyed to find out. Each year, about 34 states—almost 100 people from the executive and legislative branches of both political parties—participate in the meetings, as well as attendees from Canadian provinces, Scotland, and Australia.
In the survey, RSG participants were asked about the ways in which their attendance at meetings had influenced state health policy or how intra-state relationships had changed. “Interestingly, the networking that occurs at RSG meetings is not only between participants from other states, but also between people from within the same state who have never had an opportunity to meet or exchange ideas,” explains Christopher Koller, President of the Milbank Memorial Fund.
Sixty-two percent of participants—almost evenly divided between legislative and executive branch officials—completed the survey. Here are some of the findings.
Of legislative branch officials:
Of executive branch officials:
“People who hear that we convene meetings for policymakers might wonder whether these meetings are junkets or the source of progress,” explains Koller. “The survey responses are pretty clear—these meetings make a difference. By surveying our members, we can learn what aspects of their time together had the greatest impact on attendees and their efforts to improve the health of the communities they serve.”