The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
March 30, 2016
Report
Nancy McCall
Kristin Geonnotti
Publication
Sep 16, 2024
May 20, 2024
Back to Publications
There is ample international evidence that a high-quality, low-cost, and socially inclusive health care system must be built on a strong foundation of primary care services. Nonetheless, as a country, we spend a smaller proportion of our health care dollars on primary care than any other developed country. To act on this evidence, we must learn what constitutes high-quality primary care and how to increase its adoption.
The 18 projects involved in the Milbank Memorial Fund’s Multi-State Collaborative (MC) are engaged in multi-payer primary care transformation—and learning how to do it better. Assessing their own projects and acting on those findings have been important components of the MC programs.
Many MC members have been conducting formal evaluations of their effectiveness. To help them learn how to do their evaluations better and improve the effectiveness of their projects, the Fund engaged Mathematica Policy Research to develop this report and “evaluate the evaluations.” The report analyzes eight of the MC member evaluations.
The findings assess the strength of the evidence in the evaluations and will help improve future assessments in the critical work of making primary care better.