The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
January 17, 2019
Issue Brief
Erin C. Fuse Brown
Publication
Oct 9, 2024
Jul 10, 2024
Apr 10, 2024
Back to Publications
A certificate of public advantage (COPA) is a tool used by states to permit and oversee hospital mergers that create monopoly powers. A few months ago, we published a paper about the use of a COPA in Tennessee and Virginia.
But what happens when a COPA is repealed? In a new issue brief, Erin Fuse Brown, of Georgia State University College of Law, takes a look at the COPA law in North Carolina that was enacted in 1993 and repealed in 2015.
The paper describes the circumstances of the establishment of the COPA in North Carolina and how its repeal created a regulatory void in state oversight that allowed the merged hospital system, Mission Health, to become an unregulated monopoly. It also compares the terms of the North Carolina COPA with those of the Tennessee and Virginia COPA, noting that North Carolina’s provided fewer resources for public oversight and population health efforts than Tennessee/Virginia’s. The issue brief provides a cautionary tale for other states considering COPAs to avoid the potential adverse effects of health care consolidation. In considering policies to address provider consolidation, state officials must guard against the risk that COPAs could be used as a long-term strategy to gain an unregulated monopoly that creates the very disadvantages the state’s COPA law was designed to prevent.