The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 1977 (Volume 55)
Quarterly Article
Ann Lennarson Greer
December 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Federal government programs of the 1960s to rapidly diffuse technologies have been displaced in the ’70s by efforts to constrain costly technological growth. As a guide to action, the understanding of reasons for adoption of innovation is essential; but the utility of available diffusion theory is limited by its focus on the speed of diffusion rather than any reasons for its adoption by organizations. In a practical sense, more is known about the administrator as decision maker than about those increasing situations in which physicians play a more central part. Until coherent, empirically grounded theories of organizational innovation are available, large-scale “tests” are premature and wasteful.
Author(s): Ann Lennarson Greer
Download the article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 55, Issue 4 (pages 505–532) Published in 1977
