The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
March 1996 (Volume 74)
Quarterly Article
Virginia A. Sharpe
Alan I. Faden
December 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
In recent years the focus for the evaluation of health services has shifted from unnecessary treatment-specifically, unnecessary surgery-to appropriateness research. This new emphasis constitutes a shift in the burden of proof, indicating increased attention to the evidentiary basis of medical and surgical practice. The evaluation of the appropriateness of health services is also seen as integral to the reforming drive to contain health care costs and improve quality. Because of its pivotal role as a criterion in health care decision-making, the concept of appropriateness requires clarification. Three sources of value are defined that give meaning to “appropriateness” in patient care: the clinical point of view, the point of view of the individual patient, and the societal point of view. This framework is also used to shed light on the issue of medical futility.
Author(s): Virginia A. Sharpe; Alan I. Faden
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 74, Issue 1 (pages 115–138) Published in 1996
