The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 2024 (Volume 102)
Quarterly Article
Tracy Lam-Hine
Sarah Forthal
Candice Y. Johnson
Helen B. Chin
Sep 23, 2026
Jun 29, 2026
Jun 12, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Racial inequities in health and well-being began in the United States with colonization and slavery and have persisted as direct consequences of historic and ongoing systemic racism.1, 2 The use of racial categories to describe such disparities has been closely tied to the Census Bureau’s definitions of race and has evolved with the changing demographics of the country.3, 4 In 2000, the Census allowed respondents to select multiple races for the first time; since then, the number of people who have done so has increased by 276%, from 9 million in 2000 to 34 million in 2020 (approximately 10% of the US population).5 Multiracial people face some of the highest prevalences of adverse childhood experiences,6, 7 asthma,8 obesity,9 substance use,10 mental illness, hopeless feelings, and serious psychological distress11 of all racial groups, but studies attempting to explain these patterns are rare. Today, many medical and public health researchers view race as a socially structured marker of relative (dis)advantage rather than of biological difference,12-16 but because of long-standing institutionalized practices and for methodologic simplicity, they often continue to be measure race in mutually exclusive categories.17 However, the growing size of Multiracial populations, whose identities do not fit neatly into these categories and which have distinct racialized social experiences, draw these practices into question.18 A frequent line of questioning from those who work in these fields is, “What do I do about Multiracial people? Where do they fit into my work?” As a group of Multiracial epidemiologists (see positionality statements in Box 1), we are excited by and encourage greater engagement with these kinds of questions given present opportunities to improve equity through visibility in health data.19 We hope our framework will spur conversation and help practitioners, researchers, and policymakers think through their answers to these questions as they relate to racial health equity work.