The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 2010 (Volume 88)
Quarterly Article
Bryan R. Luce
Michael Drummond
Bengt Jönsson
Peter J. Neumann
J. Sanford Schwartz
Uwe Siebert
Sean D. Sullivan
Nov 5, 2024
Oct 30, 2024
Oct 23, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Context: The terms evidence-based medicine (EBM), health technology assessment (HTA), comparative effectiveness research (CER), and other related terms lack clarity and so could lead to miscommunication, confusion, and poor decision making. The objective of this article is to clarify their definitions and the relationships among key terms and concepts. Methods: This article used the relevant methods and policy literature as well as the websites of organizations engaged in evidence-based activities to develop a framework to explain the relationships among the terms EBM, HTA, and CER. Findings: This article proposes an organizing framework and presents a graphic demonstrating the differences and relationships among these terms and concepts. Conclusions: More specific terminology and concepts are necessary for an informed and clear public policy debate. They are even more important to inform decision making at all levels and to engender more accountability by the organizations and individuals responsible for these decisions.
Author(s): Bryan R. Luce; Michael Drummond; Bengt Jönsson; Peter J. Neumann; J. Sanford Schwartz; Uwe Siebert; Sean D. Sullivan
Keywords: evidence; policy; decision making; evidence-based medicine; health technology assessment; comparative effectiveness research
Read on Wiley Online Library
Read on JSTOR
Volume 88, Issue 2 (pages 256–276) DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00598.x Published in 2010