The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
September 1996 (Volume 74)
Quarterly Article
John R. Gist
December 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Several common perceptions about the putative linkage between deficits and entitlement spending have approached the status of folklore in deficit debates. In an effort to distinguish facts from folklore, four such perceptions are examined: that entitlement growth has caused increased deficits; that federal health care programs have driven the rapid growth in health care costs; that non-means-tested programs have been the fastest-growing entitlements; and that too large a share of entitlement benefits goes to affluent households. Although much of the conventional wisdom of entitlement growth cannot withstand scrutiny, entitlement reform will be needed, if for no other reason than the fact that the two largest entitlements-Social Security and Medicare-face long-term actuarial defits. A set of principles is identified to guide deficit reduction, and some options are discussed to resolve the imbalances in the two largest entitlements: Social Security and Medicare.
Author(s): John R. Gist
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 74, Issue 3 (pages 327–359) Published in 1996