The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 1993 (Volume 71)
Quarterly Article
Diane E. Hoffmann
Nov 5, 2024
Oct 30, 2024
Oct 23, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
More than 60 percent of hospitals have ethics committees. The widescale, voluntary adoption of these committees by hospitals is surprising, given the lack of data on their effectiveness. Little effort has been made to evaluate such committees, in part because of the lack of consensus on their purpose. The argument presented here is that, from a policy perspective, the committees’ purpose must be to safeguard patients’ interests; a framework for evaluating committees based on that objective is outlined. The criteria for evaluation include access, quality, and cost effectiveness. Existing data are used to assess ethics committees, using these criteria. Based on available data, it is questionable whether ethics committees are performing any better or worse than alternative mechanisms to achieve the same goal.
Author(s): Diane E. Hoffmann
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 71, Issue 4 (pages 677–701) Published in 1993