The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
June 2024 (Volume 102)
Quarterly Article
Jonathan C. Heller
Marjory L. Givens
Sheri P. Johnson
David A. Kindig
The Future of Population Health
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
When the World Health Organization (WHO)’s Commission on the Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) published their framework for the social determinants of health (SDOH) in 2010, they intentionally included two distinct concepts in their definition, “distinguishing between the mechanisms by which social hierarchies are created, and the conditions of daily life which then result.”1 The WHO continues to include both “the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, and age” and “the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life” in their definition.2 Perhaps responding to prior criticism, the CSDH explicitly called out changing the distribution of power as central to addressing the forces and systems that maintain inequity and was clear that engaging in this work is a political endeavor.1, 3
Yet, almost immediately, many simplified the SDOH concept to include only the conditions of daily life. As part of Healthy People 2020, which was released in 2010, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention referenced the CSDH but defined the SDOH as the “conditions in the environments in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks.”4 As others have critiqued, this depoliticizes the concept of the SDOH5 and is perhaps a result of dominant neoliberal worldviews in the United States and elsewhere.6 Indigenous scholars and practitioners extend that critique, with a focus on the importance of decolonization, sovereignty, and self-determination as key social determinants of their health.7