The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
S1 1989 (Volume 67)
Quarterly Article
John Farley
December 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Particular options for framing disease are not equally available to would-be framers. The history of parasitology in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries suggests ways in which models drawn from the study of parasitic organisms might have influenced debates over the etiology of infectious diseases and led to a unified theory if parasitology had not been segregated intellectually. Intellectual and institutional history thus determined that the study of parasites would offer little to the modern germ theory of disease by making its models unavailable to physicians and biologists seeking to understand particular ills.
Author(s): John Farley
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 67, Issue S1 (pages 50–68) Published in 1989
