The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Supporting networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
Advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources provide relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Upcoming and past Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
The Future of Population Health (Volume 101)
Quarterly Article
Lawrence O. Gostin
Eric A. Friedman
Alexandra Finch
March 2026
March 2025
June 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
The United Nations (UN) created the World Health Organization (WHO) as its first specialized agency out of the ruins and atrocities of World War II. For decades after its creation, the WHO had an unrivaled place leading world health at the very center of the global health architecture. In those early years, the WHO was one of very few institutions in the health space, later joined by the World Bank. By 1980, the WHO achieved the unimaginable—the eradication of the ancient scourge of smallpox. But the WHO’s power and influence has steadily waned, with a plethora of global institutions and actors entering the space that the WHO alone had once occupied.
Following the West African Ebola epidemic (2014-2016), the WHO enacted several key reforms, notably the creation of its Health Emergencies Programme and a Contingency Fund for Emergencies. However, the COVID-19 pandemic was a turning point for the WHO. The agency found itself embroiled in a bitter political dispute between two superpowers, China and the United States, culminating in former President Trump’s announcement that the United States would withdraw from the WHO. During COVID-19, the WHO’s leadership was called into question, and governments largely failed to comply with the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) while disregarding WHO recommendations under the IHR. This precipitated a series of audacious reform proposals. The World Health Assembly (WHA) charged an Intergovernmental Negotiating Body with negotiating and codifying a new international instrument for pandemic prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery, often referred to as a pandemic treaty.