The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 2013 (Volume 91)
Quarterly Article
Jacqueline H. Wolf
Kevin S. Wolf
Nov 5, 2024
Oct 30, 2024
Oct 23, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Context: When elderly patients face a terminal illness such as lung cancer, most are unaware that what we term in this article “the Lake Wobegon effect” taints the treatment advice imparted to them by their oncologists. In framing treatment plans, cancer specialists tend to intimate that elderly patients are like the children living in Garrison Keillor’s mythical Lake Wobegon: above average and thus likely to exceed expectations. In this article, we use the story of our mother’s death from lung cancer to investigate the consequences of elderly people’s inability to reconcile the grave reality of their illness with the overly optimistic predictions of their physicians.
Methods: In this narrative analysis, we examine the routine treatment of elderly, terminally ill cancer patients through alternating lenses: the lens of a historian of medicine who also teaches ethics to medical students and the lens of an actuary who is able to assess physicians’ claims for the outcome of medical treatments.
Findings: We recognize that a desire to instill hope in patients shapes physicians’ messages.We argue, however, that the automatic optimism conveyed to elderly, dying patients by cancer specialists prompts those patients to choose treatment that is ineffective and debilitating. Rather than primarily prolong life, treatments most notably diminish patients’ quality of life, weaken the ability of patients and their families to prepare for their deaths, and contribute significantly to the unsustainable costs of the U.S. health care system.
Conclusions: The case described in this article suggests how physicians can better help elderly, terminally ill patients make medical decisions that are less damaging to them and less costly to the health care system.
Author(s): Jacqueline H. Wolf and Kevin S.Wolf
Keywords: end-of-life care, hospice, NSCLC treatment, physician/patient communication
Read on Wiley Online Library
Volume 91, Issue 4 (pages 690–728) DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12030 Published in 2013