The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
S1 1989 (Volume 67)
Quarterly Article
Michael MacDonald
Oct 30, 2024
Oct 23, 2024
Oct 4, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Defining a behavior as a medical problem can change both its moral and legal consequences. Responses to suicide were secularized in the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as coroners’ juries increasingly adopted the medical explanation for self-destruction and excused suicides as innocent lunatics who were not criminally responsible for their act. It was medical laymen, however, not physicians, who were the principal champions of the medical explanation as they sought to alleviate the effects of the suicide laws on survivors. The change in societal attitudes and responses to suicide illustrates both the negotiated quality of disease definition and the way in which formal medical thinking constituted only one factor in a diverse political, religious, and cultural context.
Author(s): Michael MacDonald
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 67, Issue S1 (pages 69–91) Published in 1989