The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
September 2023 (Volume 101)
Quarterly Article
Kevin Fiscella
Ronald M. Epstein
Oct 30, 2024
Oct 23, 2024
Oct 4, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Policy Points:
Health matters to people and society. People generally desire to live longer, continue to function independently, and experience well-being throughout their lives. Yet, despite the United States spending more per person on health care than any other country, population health in the United States is declining and below its peer countries with persistent, stark racial and socioeconomic inequities.1-3
One potential contributor to poor US health is conceptual opacity regarding the meaning of health. When health’s meaning is opaque, health is tacitly defined narrowly as the absence of disease. This conceptual opacity perpetuates the biomedical paradigm in health care with its focus on diagnosing and treating disease. This tacit biomedical definition yields poor investment in people’s inherent health potential relative to drugs and technology, thus fostering a misalignment between the goals of health care and the goals of individuals, communities, public health, and society.
This paper aims to explore a broader, holistic understanding of health that includes biomedical health in addition to positive health that addresses the enhancement of human capabilities and well-being. We examine how the absence of a clear definition of health defaults to a narrow, biomedical meaning within the health care system with ensuing adverse consequences such as the objectification of people and the undermining of health care’s role in fostering the full health potential. Finally, we address the steps and challenges that must be considered to adopt a whole health meaning with the potential to transform and humanize health care and effectively promote equity in whole health.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE ON WILEY ONLINE LIBRARY