The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
A bipartisan group of state health policymakers from both the executive and legislative branches who are focused on improving population health.
Networks of state officials, advocates, and others aiming to invest in and transform primary care.
A program dedicated to advancing state-based efforts to make health care more affordable for residents, employers, and states.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
A leadership development program for early and mid-career state government officials who are committed to improving the health of all people in their communities.
A leadership program for senior state government officials who are committed to improving population health.
The Fund focuses on creating an affordable health care system built on strong primary care and partnerships that improve health outcomes for all.
Improving state leaders’ ability to enact and implement evidence-based health policies.
Advancing policies that create a more prevention- and primary care-oriented health system.
Improving population health through policies that contain health care cost growth.
Our state health policy resources offer relevant data analysis and best practices.
The Fund publishes reports, issues briefs, and case studies on state health policy issues.
Short takes on health policy issues from Milbank staff and guest authors.
Insights from Milbank President Debra Lubar on state health policymaking.
Reported articles and Q&As on timely health policy issues, as well as foundation updates.
Milbank Memorial Fund and Milbank Quarterly webinars featuring state health policymakers and researchers.
Updates and expert contact information for reporters.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is a private foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 1992 (Volume 70)
Quarterly Article
Helena Temkin-Greener
Mark R. Meiners
Elizabeth A. Petty
Jill S. Szydlowski
Sep 25, 2026
Sep 23, 2026
Sep 22, 2026
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Lack of data has limited research into the high cost and ethical dilemmas associated with care of the dying elderly. This study is based on a five-year, person-specific file of Medicare and Medicaid use and cost data for residents of Monroe County, New York, over the age of 65. It examines and compares utilization and expenditure patterns of the Medicare-only and the Medicare-Medicaid (dually eligible) decedents in 1988. Examination of reimbursement for nonacute services, not covered by Medicare, reveals that services for the “older old” may be less costly immediately prior to death than for younger decedents. However, when expenses in the year prior to the year of death are also counted, services for the dually eligible, older old decedents appear to be neither more nor less costly than for younger decedents. Distribution of expenses does, however, vary considerably with age. The younger decedents, aged 65 to 74, use 55 percent of their medical resources on hospital care, paid for by Medicare; the older old use 26 percent for hospital services and pay 67 percent for supportive care, reimbursed by Medicaid. The study suggests that medical intervention associated with dying is utilized more often and at a higher cost by younger decedents.
Author(s): Helena Temkin-Greener; Mark R. Meiners; Elizabeth A. Petty; Jill S. Szydlowski
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 70, Issue 4 (pages 679–701) Published in 1992