The Fund supports networks of state health policy decision makers to help identify, inspire, and inform policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund supports two state leadership programs for legislative and executive branch state government officials committed to improving population health.
The Fund identifies and shares policy ideas and analysis to advance state health leadership, strong primary care, and sustainable health care costs.
Keep up with news and updates from the Milbank Memorial Fund. And read the latest blogs from our thought leaders, including Fund President Christopher F. Koller.
The Fund publishes The Milbank Quarterly, as well as reports, issues briefs, and case studies on topics important to health policy leaders.
The Milbank Memorial Fund is is a foundation that works to improve population health and health equity.
December 1974 (Volume 52)
Quarterly Article
Harris S. Cohen
Winston J. Dean
December 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Back to The Milbank Quarterly
Presented in this paper is an analysis of the regulations for physician assistants promulgated by state administrative agencies, usually the board of medical examiners, pursuant to statutory authority. These regulations represent a further step in the evolution of state policy concerning this new health manpower occupation. Although there is considerable variability in the regulatory approaches that have been adopted to date, the paper points out certain provisions that may especially inhibit or facilitate the wide utilization of the physician assistant. Notwithstanding certain excellent provisions found in some of the states’ rules and regulations, there does not appear to be, at this time, a model regulatory system. Primary attention of the paper is focused on those regulatory issues that have most immediate and direct bearing on the education and employment of physician assistants. These include approval of training programs, job description requirements, approval of the supervising physician, supervision of the physician assistant, mechanisms for assuring continued competence, and disciplinary procedures. In addition, certain recommendations are made that would encourage greater uniformity in the state regulations.
Author(s): Harris S. Cohen; Winston J. Dean
Download the Article
Read on JSTOR
Volume 52, Issue 4 (pages 349–376) Published in 1974